Bark et al v. Northrop et al
Plaintiff: Bark, Friends of Mount Hood, Northwest Environmental Defense Center and Sierra Club
Defendant: Kent Connaughton, Lisa Northrop, United States Forest Service and Bill Westbrook
Intervenor Defendant: RLK and Company
Case Number: 3:2013cv00828
Filed: May 16, 2013
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Ann L. Aiken
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 230 ORDER and OPINION: Denying Motion for Summary Judgment 215 ; Denying Motion for Reconsideration 216 ; Granting Motion for Summary Judgment 218 ; Granting Motion for Summary Judgment 219 See, formal Order and Opinion. Signed on 3/31/2018 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rdr)
March 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 192 ORDER: Denying Motion for Summary Judgment 118 ; Granting Motion for Summary Judgment 128 ; Granting Motion to Strike 132 Motion to Strike And Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Strike 155 , Second Motion to S trike 170 , Third Motion to Strike 179 , Cross Motion for Summary Judgment Defendant-Intervenor's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike Extra-Record Material and Memoranda in Support of Motions and in Opposi tion to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment 128 , Motion to Amend/Correct November 9, 2015 Oral Argument Transcript Transcript of Proceedings,, 185 186 , Motion for Summary Judgment 118 , Motion to Strike Ex tra-Record Evidence and Memorandum in Support 132 , Motion for Summary Judgment Federal Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment 139 ; Granting Motion for Summary J udgment 139 ; Denying as Moot Motion to Strike 155 ; Granting Motion to Strike 170 ; Granting Motion to Strike 179 ; Granting in part and denying in part Motion to Amend/Correct 186 . Within 30 days from the date of this Opinion and Order, the Forest Service shall provide a status report on the renewed consultation. The parties shall also confer and inform the Court whether they are amenable to judicial settlement efforts. Signed on 3/25/16 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ljb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bark et al v. Northrop et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bark
Represented By: Ralph O. Bloemers
Represented By: Christopher G. Winter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Friends of Mount Hood
Represented By: Ralph O. Bloemers
Represented By: Christopher G. Winter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Represented By: Ralph O. Bloemers
Represented By: Christopher G. Winter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sierra Club
Represented By: Ralph O. Bloemers
Represented By: Christopher G. Winter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kent Connaughton
Represented By: Sean E. Martin
Represented By: Stephen J. Odell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lisa Northrop
Represented By: Sean E. Martin
Represented By: Stephen J. Odell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Forest Service
Represented By: Sean E. Martin
Represented By: Stephen J. Odell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bill Westbrook
Represented By: Sean E. Martin
Represented By: Stephen J. Odell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor defendant: RLK and Company
Represented By: Sarah J. Crooks
Represented By: Erika E. Malmen
Represented By: Robert A. Maynard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?