Benson Tower Condominium Owners Association v. Victaulic Company
Benson Tower Condominium Owners Association |
Victaulic Company |
3:2013cv01010 |
June 17, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
Michael H. Simon |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 347 Opinion and Order - Plaintiff's Motion for Reasonable Expenses, Including Attorney's Fees (Dkt. 281 ), Defendant's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Dkt. 299 ), and Defendant's Motion for New Trial (Dkt. 301 ) are all DENIED. Signed on 5/11/2015 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 236 Order on Pretrial Motions and Other Matters. Signed on 12/29/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 111 Amended Opinion and Order - Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 89 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants Motion to Strike Punitive Damages (Dkt. 82 ) is DENIED. Signed on 10/15/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (Amended to reflect the correct party as Defendant for Motion Dkt. 82 ) (mja) |
Filing 76 ORDER - Defendant Victaulic Company's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and violation of the UTPA and to strike punitive damages 58 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff may replead within 14 days from the date of this Opinion and Order. Signed on 5/27/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.