Bark v. Northrop et al
| Bark |
| U.S. Forest Service and Lisa Northrop |
| 3:2013cv01267 |
| July 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Janice M. Stewart |
| Environmental Matters |
| National Forest Management Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
OPINION & ORDER: The Court concludes that the Forest Service has not violated NFMA or NEPA. Therefore, Plaintiffs motion 51 is denied, Defendants motion 57 is granted, and Defendant-Intervenors motion 60 is granted. See 30-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 4/11/2014 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER: The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation 33 . Accordingly, the motion to intervene 6 is granted with the following limitations: (1) Interfor will not be able to conduct discovery, (2) Interfor mus t seek to supplement the administrative record by a date set by the Court, and (3) Interfor will file its brief after the U.S. Forest Service according to a schedule set by the Court and must not duplicate any arguments made by the U.S. Forest Service. See 3-page order attached. Signed on 12/12/2013 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
|
Filing
29
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 11/8/2013 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
