Lowry et al v. Sherwood Charter School et al
Ashley Larson, Shaun Delynn Lowry and T.R.L. |
Sherwood Charter School and Sherwood Charter School Board |
3:2013cv01562 |
September 4, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
Marco A. Hernandez |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' Bill of Costs 65 is granted in the amount of $7,690.15. See 10-page opinion & order attached. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr) |
Filing 63 OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' summary judgment motion 46 is granted. See 58-page opinion & order attached. Ordered by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr) |
Filing 31 OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' motion to dismiss 23 is granted in part and denied in part as follows: (1) the motion is granted as to Lowry's and Larson's section 1983 due process claims (Third Claim for Relief); (2) the motio n directed to portions of the ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims is denied (Fourth and Fifth Claims for Relief); (3) the motion is granted as to Lowry's IIED claim (Sixth Claim for Relief); (4) the motion is granted as to the breach of contract c laim (Seventh Claim for Relief); and (5) the motion is granted as to the negligence claims brought by Larson, Lowry, and G.L, but denied as to the negligence claim brought by T.L. (Eighth Claim for Relief). See 32-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 3/6/2014 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.