Johnson v. Elton et al
| Michelle Aryellah Johnson |
| Troy Becnel, Travis Elton and Josh Jones |
| 3:2013cv02144 |
| December 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Janice M. Stewart |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation, Dkt. 71 . Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 39 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion to strike and for sanctions for fraud upon the court (Dkt. 55 ) is DENIED. Further, the Court finds that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should be revoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed on 2/4/2015 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accord ingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation, Dkt. 32 . The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment Pursuant to Rule 57 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Dkt. 25 . Signed on 7/24/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
