Zweizig v. Rote et al
|Does 1-10, Northwest Direct Marketing of Oregon, Inc., Northwest Direct Marketing, Inc., Northwest Direct Teleservices, Inc. and Timothy Rote
|March 11, 2014
|US District Court for the District of Oregon
|Portland (3) Office
|Janice M. Stewart
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 25, 2018
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. The Court finds in favor of Defendant Rote on all of Plaintiff's claims against him. Because it would be inconsistent to enter a judgment in favor of Plaintiff on the same claims against the remaining defaulted Defendants, the Court declines to do so. Judgment, therefore, shall be entered in favor of Defendants on all claims. Signed on 7/25/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
|June 15, 2017
ORDER: The Court adopts in part and declines to adopt in part Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendations 195 . Accordingly, Defendant Rote's Motion for Summary Judgment 149 and Amended Motion for Sanctions 152 are denied, except to the extent Mr. Rote argues that Plaintiff may not recover damages for expenses incurred in the prior arbitration proceeding. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 6/15/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (pvh)
|December 16, 2014
ORDER: The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation 35 . Therefore, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 19 is denied with respect to Plaintiff's first and second claims for relief, and granted with respect to Plaintiff's third claim for relief, which is dismissed with leave to amend. See 3-page order attached. Signed on 12/16/2014 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?