Forest Grove School District v. Student

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Forest Grove School District v. Student

Forest Grove School District v. Student

Plaintiff:	Forest Grove School District
Defendant:	Student
Case Number:	3:2014cv00444
Filed:	March 18, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge:	John V. Acosta
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action:	20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 27, 2018	Filing 66 OPINION and ORDER - The court AFFIRMS in part and REVERSES in part the decision of ALJ Allen and concludes the following: (1) the District denied Parents' the opportunity to meaningfully participate in Student's education from December 6, 2011 to the end of academic year 2012 by continuing to rely on the faulty November 2011 IEP; and (2) the District denied Student a FAPE by failing to treat Student's anxiety and self-management from December 6, 2011 to the end of academic year 2012. The court rules in favor of the District on all remaining claims. An award of remedies is unwarranted and/or is moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.DATED this 27th day of NOVEMBER, 2018, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
April 12, 2018	Filing 61 OPINION and ORDER - Based on the foregoing, the District's Motion to Strike 55 is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 12th day of April, 2018, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 27, 2018

Filing 66 OPINION and ORDER - The court AFFIRMS in part and REVERSES in part the decision of ALJ Allen and concludes the following: (1) the District denied Parents' the opportunity to meaningfully participate in Student's education from December 6, 2011 to the end of academic year 2012 by continuing to rely on the faulty November 2011 IEP; and (2) the District denied Student a FAPE by failing to treat Student's anxiety and self-management from December 6, 2011 to the end of academic year 2012. The court rules in favor of the District on all remaining claims. An award of remedies is unwarranted and/or is moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.DATED this 27th day of NOVEMBER, 2018, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)

April 12, 2018

Filing 61 OPINION and ORDER - Based on the foregoing, the District's Motion to Strike 55 is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 12th day of April, 2018, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Forest Grove School District v. Student
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Forest Grove School District
Represented By:	Richard G. Cohn-Lee
Represented By:	Nancy J. Hungerford
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Student
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?