City Antiques Inc. v. Planned Furniture Promotions Inc.

Plaintiff: City Antiques Inc
Defendant: Planned Furniture Promotions Inc.
Case Number: 3:2014cv00467
Filed: March 21, 2014
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Simon
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 12, 2014 17 Opinion or Order of the Court Opinion and Order - The Court GRANTS Defendant Planned Furniture's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3) and the first-to-file rule. Dkt. 6 . The Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE City Antiques' complaint. Signed on 8/12/2014 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: City Antiques Inc. v. Planned Furniture Promotions Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: City Antiques Inc
Represented By: William D. Brandt
Represented By: Robert J. Custis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Planned Furniture Promotions Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?