Malbco Holdings, LLC v. Patel et al
| Malbco Holdings, LLC |
| Bhupendra R. Patel, Heetan B. Patel, Mukesh Patel, Neela B. Patel and Heetal B. Patel-Manini |
| 3:2014cv00947 |
| June 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Paul Papak |
| Other Fraud |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3731 Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
168
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 149 . Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 128 , 129 , and 130 are denied, with leave to renew theattorney's fee portion of the motion after entry of judgment, if appropriate. Signed on 10/29/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (sss)
|
|
Filing
167
OPINION & ORDER. Plaintiff's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative for an Order Treating Specified Facts as Established 139 , is granted as to Motions One, Two, and Three, and denied as to Motion Four. Defendants Bhupendra R. Patel and Nila B. Patel's Motion for Joinder 142 , joined by Defendants Heetal B. Patel-Manini and Heetan B. Patel 145 and by Defendant Mukesh Patel 146 is denied. Signed on 10/7/2016 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gw)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER: The Court AFFIRMS Magistrate Judge Papak's Order 113 . See 2-page order attached. Signed on 2/24/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
|
Filing
90
OPINION & ORDER: The parties' three current discovery disputes, which were informally submitted to the court in Defendants' June 9, 2015, letters and Malbco's June 16, 2015, letter, are resolved as follows: 1) Defendants' ; Motion to Quash is Denied; 2) Protective Order Dispute is resolved as follows: (1) regarding the proposed clawback and waiver provisions proposed by Defendants, the parties shall draft the Protective Order consistent with the model protective ord ers provided by this court, (2) the parties shall include in the Protective Order a provision specifying the re-use of discovered materials in the three types of ancillary proceedings listed above; 3) Malbco's Motion to Compel adequate answer s to the six specified interrogatories submitted to Defendants Bhupendra and Nila Patel on October 13, 2014, is Granted and those defendants are ordered to provide sufficient answers within fourteen (14) days of this order. Signed on 8/12/15 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
76
OPINION & ORDER: Malbco's request for this court to conduct an in camera review of the documents listed under items (c)(i) and (c)(ii) on page 19 of Malbco's Motion to Compel 67 is Granted, and those documents should be su bmitted to the court no later than 5/30/2015. Accordingly, I will conduct an in camera review of those communications and provide an order pertaining to Malbco's Motion as it applies to the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege based on that review. That aspect of Malbco's Motion 67 is therefore Stayed pending my review. Further, Malbco's Motion to Compel 67 is Denied in Part as it applies to the second category of communications, discussed above. Finally, Malbco's request regarding the third category of communications, made in the alternative, for this court to conduct an in camera review of those documents listed under item (a) on page 33 of Malbco's Motion is Granted, a nd those documents should be submitted to the court no later than 5/30/2015. Malbco's Motion concerning the third category of communications is Stayed pending an in camera review of those materials. Signed on 5/13/15 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER: The Court AFFIRMS Magistrate Judge Papak's Order 41 . See 2-page order attached. Signed on 3/19/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
