Redwind v. Western Union
Sage Redwind |
Western Union and Western Union, LLC |
3:2014cv01699 |
October 27, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
John V. Acosta |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 202 OPINION and ORDER - Defendant's motion (Bill of Costs 190 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and defendant is awarded $10,619.87 in costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 16th day of September, 2016, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) |
Filing 188 ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation 183 . Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 95 is granted. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 6/16/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr) |
Filing 182 OPINION and ORDER - Western Union's evidentiary objections are SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part. Redwind's evidentiary objections are also SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part, and her Motion to Strike Evidence 156 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of May, 2016, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.