Powell v. Adlerhorst International, Inc., et al
| Nathan Powell |
| Adlerhorst International, Inc. and Oregon Police Canine Association |
| Adlerhorst International, Inc. |
| Nathan Powell |
| 3:2014cv01827 |
| November 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Michael W. Mosman |
| Personal Inj. Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
192
Opinion re Bill of Costs (Defendant's) 186 , Order regarding Bill of Costs (Defendant's) 186 . Signed on 04/12/2017 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (rs)
|
|
Filing
138
CIVIL MINUTE ORDER: This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 118 . The Court DENIES Defendant's Motion. See order for full text. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
|
Filing
54
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant Adlerhorst has not carried its burden to demonstrate no genuine issue of material fact exists. A reasonable jury could find Azi was defective and unreasonably dangerous at the time of the sale to the City of Sherw ood and that Azi reached the City without substantial changes.A reasonable jury could also find Mr. Reaver knew or reasonably should have known Azi was not fit for police dog service and never should have been sold to the City. Therefore, I DENY Defendant Adlerhorsts Motion for Summary Judgment 26 . Signed on 11/4/15 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
