Gregory v. Newberg et al
| Austin Gregory |
| Brian Casey, Huntley Miller and City of Newberg |
| 3:2015cv00473 |
| March 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Anna J. Brown |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
Opinion and Order. The Court GRANTS Defendants Amended Motion 29 to Dismiss and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice. Defendants Motion 27 to Dismiss is moot. Signed on 03/17/2016 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 12 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
|
Filing
11
Opinion and Order. The Court GRANTS Defendants Motion 8 for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Court also GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint no later than October 9, 2015, only (1) to the extent that Plaintiff can allege negligence b ased on a separate set of facts or allege a claim for negligence specifically in the alternative to his § 1983 claims and (2) to cure the deficiencies of his Monell claim as set out in this Opinion and Order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an Amended Complaint will result in dismissal of this matter with prejudice. Signed on 09/21/2015 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 23 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
