Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Doe-220.127.116.11
||Cobbler Nevada, LLC
||May 20, 2015
||US District Court for the District of Oregon
||Portland (3) Office
||Janice M. Stewart
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 4, 2017
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS IN PART Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 51 , as explained herein. Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs (ECF 47 ) is GRANTED IN PART. The Court will issue a Judgment dism issing with prejudice Plaintiff's indirect infringement claim and without prejudice Plaintiff's direct infringement claim against Mr. Gonzales. Attorney's fees are awarded in the amount of $17,222.40 and costs are awarded in the amount of $252.20. Signed on 1/4/2017 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|June 8, 2016
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation 35 . Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 27 and DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's Second Claim for indirect infrin gement. The Court also DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's First Claim for direct infringement. This matter is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings regarding the dismissal of Plaintiff's First Claim without prejudice and, if the Magistrate Judge deems appropriate, to set a schedule for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies already noted. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 6/8/2016 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gw)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?