Heidt v. City of McMinnville et al
Timothy Heidt |
City of McMinnville and Ron Noble |
3:2015cv00989 |
June 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
Michael H. Simon |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 106 Opinion and Order - The City Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF 88 ) and Defendant Berry's Motion to Dismiss (ECF 89 ) are GRANTED. Heidt's Third Amended Complaint (ECF 82 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed on 6/5/2017 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 79 Opinion and Order - The City Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF 53 ), Yamhill County's Motion to Dismiss (ECF 63 ), and Defendant Berry's Motion to Dismiss (ECF 68 ) are all GRANTED. Heidt's Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSE D. Heidt's claims against Yamhill County and due process claims based on an alleged deprivation of a liberty interest in employment are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Heidt's remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and with leave to replead within 14 days from the date of this Opinion and Order, if Heidt can cure the deficiencies identified in this Opinion and Order. Signed on 11/29/2016 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 14 Opinion and Order - The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. 5 . All claims are dismissed without prejudice. Heidt may file an amended complaint within 30 days of this Opinion and Order. Signed on 12/29/2015 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.