Hill v. George Fox University
Darlene Hill |
George Fox University |
3:2015cv01148 |
June 25, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
Michael W. Mosman |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER: George Fox's Motion for Summary Judgment 17 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. See order for full text. Signed on 4/11/17 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hill v. George Fox University | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: George Fox University | |
Represented By: | Lloyd Bernstein |
Represented By: | Peder A. Rigsby |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Darlene Hill | |
Represented By: | Kevin C. Brague |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.