Heine v. Bank of Oswego
Plaintiff: Dan Heine
Defendant: Bank of Oswego
Counter Claimant: Bank of Oswego
Counter Defendant: Dan Heine
Interested Non-Party: Diana Yates
Case Number: 3:2015cv01622
Filed: August 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Simon
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 126 Opinion and Order - Plaintiff's Motion for Further Relief Based on the Courts Declaratory Judgment (ECF 86 ) and Plaintiff's Second Motion for Further Relief Based on the Court's Declaratory Judgment (ECF 111 ) are DENIED without prejudice and with leave to renew consistent with this Opinion and Order. Signed on 7/27/2017 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
November 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 70 Opinion and Order - Based on the evidence presented at trial and the record in this case, the Court finds that Heine is entitled to partial judgment in his favor on his First and Third Claims. Moreover, Heine's existing debts to the Bank under the Bank's counterclaims may not be setoff against any advancement of expenses that the Bank is required to make to Heine in connection with the Criminal Action. Signed on 11/13/2015 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heine v. Bank of Oswego
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Bank of Oswego
Represented By: G. Kevin Kiely
Represented By: Casey M. Nokes
Represented By: Nicole M. Swift
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of Oswego
Represented By: G. Kevin Kiely
Represented By: Casey M. Nokes
Represented By: Nicole M. Swift
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Dan Heine
Represented By: Jeffrey Alberts
Represented By: Caroline Harris Crowne
Represented By: Bryan T. Mohler
Represented By: Scott C. Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dan Heine
Represented By: Jeffrey Alberts
Represented By: Caroline Harris Crowne
Represented By: Bryan T. Mohler
Represented By: Scott C. Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested non-party: Diana Yates
Represented By: Janet Lee Hoffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?