Glacier Films (USA), Inc. et al v. Doe-73.25.26.28
Glacier Films (USA), Inc. and Glacier Films 1, LLC |
Doe-73.25.26.28 |
3:2015cv01632 |
August 28, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
Stacie F. Beckerman |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER - Plaintiffs' motion for attorney's fees (ECF 42 ) and request for costs (ECF 41 ) are GRANTED. Plaintiffs are awarded $1,169 for attorney's fees and $583.50 in costs. Signed on 7/5/2016 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 38 ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Acco rdingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation, Dkt. 28 . Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment (Dkt. 28 ) is GRANTED. A judgment will be entered against Defendant, permanently enjoining him from infringing Plaintiffs' rights in the movie American Heist and awarding $750 in statutory damages. Signed on 6/2/2016 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Filing 14 OPINION AND ORDER. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion for the issuance of a Rule 45 subpoena 9 , and authorizes Plaintiffs to depose the Subscriber. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 11/30/2015 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (gw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.