Holdner v. Coba et al
Katy Coba and Dick Pederson |
William F. Holdner |
3:2015cv02039 |
October 29, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
John V. Acosta |
Agriculture Acts |
07 U.S.C. ยง 499 Agricultural Commodities Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 OPINION and ORDER - Defendants' Motion 63 to Dismiss is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. DATED this 2nd day of July, 2018, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (peg) |
Filing 58 OPINION and ORDER - Defendants' motion 47 for attorney fees is GRANTED, in part. Defendants are entitled to an award of attorney fees under Section 1988 in the amount of $13,723.80. DATED this 9th day of November, 2016, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (copy of this opinion and order mailed to plaintiff) (peg) |
Filing 56 OPINION and ORDER - Plaintiff's motion 54 regarding review of magistrate decision is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 31st day of August, 2016, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (copy mailed to plaintiff this date) (peg) |
Filing 50 OPINION and ORDER - The proper route of appeal of the court's Order and Judgment is to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Holdner's motion/appeal 49 is procedurally invalid and is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 22nd day of August, 2016, by United States Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (copy of this document mailed to plaintiff this date) (peg) |
Filing 45 AMENDED OPINION and ORDER - DATED this 8th day of August, 2016, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (copy mailed to plaintiff this date) (peg) |
Filing 43 OPINION and ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 36 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 3rd day of August, 2016, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (copy mailed to plaintiff this date) (peg) |
Filing 35 OPINION and ORDER - Defendants' motion 12 to dismiss is GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 1st day of June, 2016, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (copy of this opinion and order mailed to plaintiff this date) (peg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.