Johnson v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Johnson v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office

Johnson v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office

Plaintiff:	Mario Lee Johnson
Defendant:	Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
Case Number:	3:2016cv00633
Filed:	April 13, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge:	Marco A. Hernandez
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 7, 2016	Filing 11 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's amended application for leave to proceed IFP 9 is granted solely for the limited purpose of evaluating Plaintiff's amended complaint. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 8 is denied. B ased on the foregoing, Plaintiff's amended complaint 7 is dismissed. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint, curing the deficiencies noted above, within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an ame nded complaint which cures the deficiencies noted may result in the dismissal of this proceeding with prejudice. In addition, if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, he must also file an amended application for leave to proceed IFP that co mplies with this Court's order. The Court will reevaluate its decision regarding Plaintiff's IFP status at that juncture, based on the amended application. See 6-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 6/7/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Copy of opinion & order mailed to plaintiff. (mr)
April 20, 2016	Filing 5 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed IFP 1 is granted. Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel 3 is denied. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's Complaint 2 is dismissed. Plaintiff may file an amend ed complaint, curing the deficiencies noted above, within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended complaint which cures the deficiencies noted may result in the dismissal of this proceeding with prejudi ce. In addition, if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, he must also file an amended application for leave to proceed IFP. The Court will reevaluate its decision to grant Plaintiff's IFP application at that juncture, based on the amended application. See 9-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 4/20/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 7, 2016

Filing 11 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's amended application for leave to proceed IFP 9 is granted solely for the limited purpose of evaluating Plaintiff's amended complaint. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 8 is denied. B ased on the foregoing, Plaintiff's amended complaint 7 is dismissed. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint, curing the deficiencies noted above, within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an ame nded complaint which cures the deficiencies noted may result in the dismissal of this proceeding with prejudice. In addition, if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, he must also file an amended application for leave to proceed IFP that co mplies with this Court's order. The Court will reevaluate its decision regarding Plaintiff's IFP status at that juncture, based on the amended application. See 6-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 6/7/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Copy of opinion & order mailed to plaintiff. (mr)

April 20, 2016

Filing 5 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed IFP 1 is granted. Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel 3 is denied. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's Complaint 2 is dismissed. Plaintiff may file an amend ed complaint, curing the deficiencies noted above, within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file an amended complaint which cures the deficiencies noted may result in the dismissal of this proceeding with prejudi ce. In addition, if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, he must also file an amended application for leave to proceed IFP. The Court will reevaluate its decision to grant Plaintiff's IFP application at that juncture, based on the amended application. See 9-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 4/20/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mario Lee Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?