Rinegard-Guirma v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
||Natache D. Rinegard-Guirma
||OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
||June 6, 2016
||US District Court for the District of Oregon
||Portland (3) Office
||Marco A. Hernandez
|Nature of Suit:
||Real Property: Foreclosure
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 10, 2016
OPINION & ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 9 is dismissed with prejudice. In addition, her IFP status is revoked because any appeal of this Order would be frivolous and, thus, not be taken in good faith. See Fed. R. Civ . P. 24(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a party may not proceed IFP on appeal if the district court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith); see also Matter of Hawaii Corp., 796 F.2d 1139, 1144 (9th Cir. 1986) (a frivolous a ppeal is one where the result is obvious or the arguments are wholly without merit). Any pending motions are denied as moot. See 7-page opinion & order of dismissal attached. Signed on 8/10/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Copy of this document mailed to plaintiff. (mr)
|June 24, 2016
OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 1 is granted, but Plaintiff's complaint 2 is dismissed without prejudice. Any pending motions are denied as moot. If Plaintiff chooses to amend her complaint, she must do so within 30 days of the date below. The Clerk's Office shall withhold issuance of any summons until further order of the Court. See 5-page opinion & order attached. Signed on 6/24/2016 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. Copy of opinion & order mailed to plaintiff. (mr)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?