Reebok International LTD et al v. TRB Acquisitions LLC et al
| Reebok International LTD and Reebok International Limited |
| Elite Performance Footwear LLC, RBX Active 01 LLC, RBX Direct LLC, RBX.COM LLC and TRB Acquisitions LLC |
| 3:2016cv01618 |
| August 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Michael H. Simon |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
Opinion and Order - Defendants' motion for stay pending resolution of IPR proceedings (ECF 55 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE and with leave to renew, if appropriate, based on new circumstances consistent with this Opi nion and Order. The parties shall file a joint status report informing the Court of the disposition of Defendants' petitions within seven days of the PTO's final decision on whether to grant IPR. Signed on 9/22/2017 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
|
Filing
53
Opinion and Order - The Court does not believe that oral argument is necessary or helpful to the resolution of the pending motion and, therefore, strikes the hearing set for July 31, 2017, at 4:00 p.m. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue (ECF 44 ) is DENIED. Signed on 7/14/2017 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
