Blocker v. Bandmine.com et al
||Bandmine.com, Webnames CA Inc and eBay Inc.
||August 25, 2016
||US District Court for the District of Oregon
||Portland (3) Office
||John V. Acosta
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 8, 2018
OPINION and ORDER - I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 96 as my own opinion. The claims against the remaining defendants, Webnames and Bandmine, are dismissed without prejudice, for lack of prosecution.IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 8th day of June, 2018, by Chief United States District Judge Michael W. Mosman. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (peg)
|September 26, 2017
OPINION and ORDER ADOPTING Judge Acosta's Amended Findings and Recommendation as my own opinion. Defendant eBay's Motion 8 to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint with prejudice and without leave to amend is GRANTED. Defendant Webnames' Motion 29 to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is GRANTED. Blocker's claims against Bandmine are DISMISSED for lack of timely service. Defendant eBay's Motion for Sanctions 29 is DENIED. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint against Defendant Webnames within 30 days of the filing date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 9/26/17 by Chief United States District Judge Michael W. Mosman.(copy mailed to Tyrone Blocker) (peg)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?