Metzler v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Stephen J. Metzler
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2016cv02000
Filed: October 17, 2016
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Owen M. Panner
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:0405g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 24, 2017 19 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER: Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four, the Court REVERSES the Commissioners decision and REMANDS for further administrative proceedings. (See 13 page opinion for more information.) Signed on 8/24/17 by Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan. (dsg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Metzler v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Janice E. Hebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen J. Metzler
Represented By: James S. Coon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?