Vimegnon v. Oregon Health and Science University

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Vimegnon v. Oregon Health and Science University

Vimegnon v. Oregon Health and Science University

Plaintiff:	Yves Hector Vimegnon
Defendant:	Oregon Health and Science University
Case Number:	3:2016cv02304
Filed:	December 9, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge:	Marco A. Hernandez
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 8, 2017	Filing 22 OPINION & ORDER: Defendant's motion to dismiss 15 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is given leave to file a Second Amended Complaint consistent with the rulings in this Opinion & Order, no later than twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Opinion & Order. Signed on 8/8/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)
January 9, 2017	Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER - Plaintiff's IFP application 4 is denied. Plaintiff must either pay the filing fee or file an amended IFP application within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff files an amended application, he must detail the expenses as requested in Paragraph 8. Further, he must explain why Plaintiff's mother-in-law qualifies as a dependent as opposed to being the recipient of Plaintiff's wife's generosity. Finally, if Plaintiff does not pay the filing fee or file an amended application by the deadline indicated here, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed on 1/9/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Copy of this Opinion and Order mailed to plaintiff on 1/9/2017) (pg). Modified on 1/10/2017 (pg).

Date Filed

Document Text

August 8, 2017

Filing 22 OPINION & ORDER: Defendant's motion to dismiss 15 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is given leave to file a Second Amended Complaint consistent with the rulings in this Opinion & Order, no later than twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Opinion & Order. Signed on 8/8/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp)

January 9, 2017

Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER - Plaintiff's IFP application 4 is denied. Plaintiff must either pay the filing fee or file an amended IFP application within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff files an amended application, he must detail the expenses as requested in Paragraph 8. Further, he must explain why Plaintiff's mother-in-law qualifies as a dependent as opposed to being the recipient of Plaintiff's wife's generosity. Finally, if Plaintiff does not pay the filing fee or file an amended application by the deadline indicated here, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed on 1/9/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Copy of this Opinion and Order mailed to plaintiff on 1/9/2017) (pg). Modified on 1/10/2017 (pg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vimegnon v. Oregon Health and Science University
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Oregon Health and Science University
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yves Hector Vimegnon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?