Estate of Marjory Gail Thomas Osborn-Vincent v. Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.
| Estate of Marjory Gail Thomas Osborn-Vincent |
| Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. |
| 3:2016cv02305 |
| December 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Youlee Yim You |
| Contract: Other Contract Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
269
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge You's recommendations, and I ADOPT the F&R (ECF 267 ) as my own opinion. I GRANT Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (ECF 237 ) and Bill of Costs (ECF 261 ). I AWARD Defendants $8,490.10 in costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 9/28/2023 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (pvh)
|
|
Filing
266
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge You's recommendations, and I ADOPT the F&R (ECF 258 ) as my own opinion. I DENY Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF 237 ) and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions (ECF 239 ), as amended by Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Supplement (ECF 243 ). Decision is reserved on Defendants' Motion for Costs (ECF 237 ). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 7/28/2023 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (pvh)
|
|
Filing
257
ORDER: Defendants may submit a new bill of costs by June 2, 2023. Any new bill of costs shall be accompanied by a supplemental brief or declaration describing with specificity the costs requested for each of the categories allowed by 28 U.S .C. § 1920 and, where necessary, how those costs were necessarily incurred for the case. Plaintiff shall have 14 days after the filing of any new bill of costs to respond. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED May 19, 2023, by United States Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pjg)
|
|
Filing
235
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge You's recommendation, and I ADOPT the F&R (ECF 213 ). I LIFT the stay, GRANT Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 200 ), and DISMISS this case with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 9/9/2022 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (pvh)
|
|
Filing
186
OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (ECF # 178 ) is DENIED, and defendants' motion for protective order quashing the deposition of Trina Iijima (ECF # 179 ) is GRANTED, except for the issue of whether reasonable expenses should be awarded pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(A), which is deferred. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 9/03/2019 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh)
|
|
Filing
147
OPINION AND ORDER. Upon review, I agree with Judge You's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 134 as my own opinion. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss or strike Defendants' counterclaim for attorney fees 96 is DENIED. Plaintiff& #039;s motion to strike Defendants' affirmative defenses 96 is GRANTED in that references to ORS 124.110(1)(b) in paragraphs 51(b)(2) and (4) of the Answer 90 are stricken and is otherwise DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 2/25/2019 by Chief Judge Michael W. Mosman. (pvh)
|
|
Filing
131
OPINION AND ORDER. The court grants defendant's motion for protective order (ECF # 112 ) and adopts defendants' form of protective order (ECF #[114-4]). The court will separately issue a protective order to that effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 12/27/2018 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh)
|
|
Filing
68
OPINION AND ORDER: I GRANT the Estate's Motion for Leave to Amend Pleadings 30 with respect to the Third and Fourth Claims and DENIED with respect to the Fifth Claim. I GRANT AFI's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction [34 ], and I DENY Defendants' opposition to the Estate amending its pleadings to add a claim for elder abuse 34 that Judge You construed as a Motion to Dismiss the Third Claim in the Estates amended pleading. The Estate's Second Amended Complaint is due within 10 days of the date this Opinion and Order is filed, as set forth in Judge You's February 13, 2018, Order 57 . Signed on 3/30/2018 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
|
|
Filing
57
OPINION AND ORDER. The Estate's Motion to Amend to add a Fourth Claim for common law fraud (part of ECF # 30 ) is GRANTED. The Second Amended Complaint shall be filed within 10 days following a final ruling on the accompanying Findings and Recommendation regarding the Motion to Amend to add a Fifth Claim (part of ECF # 30 ) and defendants' Motion to Dismiss (part of ECF # 34 ). Signed on 2/13/2018 by Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You. (pvh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Estate of Marjory Gail Thomas Osborn-Vincent v. Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Janet Knauss Larsen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Estate of Marjory Gail Thomas Osborn-Vincent | |
| Represented By: | Amy M. Bogran |
| Represented By: | Roy B. Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
