Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Clark

Plaintiff: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Defendant: James E. Clark
Case Number: 3:2017cv00041
Filed: January 9, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Stacie F. Beckerman
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckermans Findings & Recommendation 8 . Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion to Remand 4 is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED. Signed on 4/18/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp) Modified on 4/19/2017 to correct filing date(jp).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Represented By: Jonathan D. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James E. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?