Branford v. Washington County, Oregon et al
| Angela Branford |
| John Black, Jonathan Christensen, City of Portland, Oregon, Pat Garrett and Washington County, Oregon |
| 3:2017cv00094 |
| January 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Michael H. Simon |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
Opinion and Order - The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the Washington Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 79 ) and GRANTS Branford's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment against Defendant Christensen (ECF 84 ). Thus, the claims that remain for trial are: (1) Branford's sex discrimination claims under federal and state law against Washington County for maintaining a hostile work environment based on the actions of Branford's coworkers at the WCSO (Plaintiff 's First and Second Claims); (2) Branford's § 1983 claim against Christensen (Plaintiff's Ninth Claim); (3) Branford's battery claim against Christensen (Plaintiff's Thirteenth Claim, damages only); and (4) Branford's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against Christensen (Plaintiff's Fourteenth Claim). Signed on 5/2/2019 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
|
Filing
71
Opinion and Order - Defendants' Motion to Strike Changes to Deposition Testimony (ECF 60 ) is DENIED. Signed on 5/15/2018 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
|
Filing
44
Opinion and Order - At the time Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint, the Court had original federal question jurisdiction over Myers based on Plaintiff's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court also had supplemental jurisdiction ove r the related state law claims asserted against the City. Plaintiff's state law claims, however, are only actionable under the Oregon Tort Claims Act, which requires that the City be substituted for Myers on those claims. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Myers from Plaintiff's state claims. In addition, the Court concludes that Myers is entitled to qualified immunity from suit for damages under § 1983 and that Plaintiff presents no cognizable claim under § 1983 for any other relief against Myers. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's § 1983 claim against Myers. Without a federal claim based on Defendants' conduct, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims against the City. Defendants' Motion to Substitute (ECF 27 ) and Motion to Dismiss(ECF 16 ) are GRANTED. Signed on 8/28/2017 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
