Gulf Marine & Industrial Supplies, Inc. v. M/V STRATEGIC TENACITY (ex M/V HANJIN LIVERPOOL), IMO No. 9626302, her engines, tackle, appurtenances, etc., in rem
Plaintiff: Gulf Marine & Industrial Supplies, Inc.
Defendant: M/V STRATEGIC TENACITY (ex M/V HANJIN LIVERPOOL), IMO No. 9626302, her engines, tackle, appurtenances, etc., in rem
Case Number: 3:2017cv00276
Filed: February 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Stacie F. Beckerman
Nature of Suit: Contract: Marine
Cause of Action: 28:1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gulf Marine & Industrial Supplies, Inc. v. M/V STRATEGIC TENACITY (ex M/V HANJIN LIVERPOOL), IMO No. 9626302, her engines, tackle, appurtenances, etc., in rem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gulf Marine & Industrial Supplies, Inc.
Represented By: David R. Boyajian
Represented By: C. Kent Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M/V STRATEGIC TENACITY (ex M/V HANJIN LIVERPOOL), IMO No. 9626302, her engines, tackle, appurtenances, etc., in rem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?