James v. Sapa Extrusions North America

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court James v. Sapa Extrusions North America

James v. Sapa Extrusions North America

Plaintiff:	John Frederick James
Defendant:	Sapa Extrusions North America
Case Number:	3:2017cv00338
Filed:	February 28, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge:	Anna J. Brown
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 30, 2018	Filing 37 Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS Defendants Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) Motion [#28] to Dismiss and DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiffs claims for violation of Title VII and Oregon Revised Statutes § 659A.0 30(1)(f). Accordingly, this matter will proceed only as to Plaintiffs claim for violation of § 659A.199 as set out in this Opinion and Order. Defendant directed to file no later than 2/14/18, an Answer addressing Plaintiffs claim for violation of § 659A.199. The Court DIRECTS the parties to confer and to submit no later than 2/28/18, a jointly proposed case-management plan. Signed on 01/30/18 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
June 23, 2017	Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Anna J. Brown. Signed on 6/23/17. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion (# 9 ) to Remand, GRANTS Defendant's Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)Motion (#16) to Dismiss, and DISMISSES with prejudic e Plaintiff's claims for violation of the NLRA, Plaintiff's claims for violation of Oregon Revised Statutes §§ 243.672 and 659A.200- 659A.224, and Plaintiff's claims for violation of Revised Code of Washington §§ 49 .60.210 and 41.56.140. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint no later than July 24, 2017, to the extent that Plaintiff can allege facts tosupport a claim for violation of Title VII, Oregon Revised Statutes § 659A.030(1)(f), and/or § 659A.199 as set out in this Opinion and Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for further details. (jy)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 30, 2018

Filing 37 Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS Defendants Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) Motion [#28] to Dismiss and DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiffs claims for violation of Title VII and Oregon Revised Statutes § 659A.0 30(1)(f). Accordingly, this matter will proceed only as to Plaintiffs claim for violation of § 659A.199 as set out in this Opinion and Order. Defendant directed to file no later than 2/14/18, an Answer addressing Plaintiffs claim for violation of § 659A.199. The Court DIRECTS the parties to confer and to submit no later than 2/28/18, a jointly proposed case-management plan. Signed on 01/30/18 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)

June 23, 2017

Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Anna J. Brown. Signed on 6/23/17. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion (# 9 ) to Remand, GRANTS Defendant's Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)Motion (#16) to Dismiss, and DISMISSES with prejudic e Plaintiff's claims for violation of the NLRA, Plaintiff's claims for violation of Oregon Revised Statutes §§ 243.672 and 659A.200- 659A.224, and Plaintiff's claims for violation of Revised Code of Washington §§ 49 .60.210 and 41.56.140. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint no later than July 24, 2017, to the extent that Plaintiff can allege facts tosupport a claim for violation of Title VII, Oregon Revised Statutes § 659A.030(1)(f), and/or § 659A.199 as set out in this Opinion and Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for further details. (jy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James v. Sapa Extrusions North America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Frederick James
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Sapa Extrusions North America
Represented By:	Francis T. Barnwell
Represented By:	Megan J. Crowhurst
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?