Butler v. Neuberger Berman Management LLC
||Janell Rene Butler
||Neuberger Berman Management LLC
||March 28, 2017
||Oregon District Court
||Portland (3) Office
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 10, 2017
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks' Findings & Recommendation 5 , and therefore, Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. In addition, Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Pro-Bono Counsel 8 is denied. If Plaintiff wishes to file an amended complaint, she must do so within 30 days of the date below. Signed on 5/10/2017 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jtj)
|April 12, 2017
Findings and Recommendation and Order: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (# 1 ) is GRANTED. The Complaint should be DISMISSED without service of process. Plaintiff should be given leave to file, within thirty days of the date of the Order, an amended complaint if she feels that the deficiencies noted above can be cured. This Findings and Recommendation will be referred to a district judge. Objections, if any, are due April 26, 2017. If no objections are filed , then the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement on that date. If objections are filed, then a response is due within 14 days after being served with a copy of the objections. When the response is due or filed, whichever date is earlier, the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement. Signed on 4/12/2017 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (jtj)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?