Daniel v. Oregon Health & Sciences University et al
| Sarena Daniel |
| Oregon Health & Sciences University and David Scott |
| 3:2017cv00542 |
| April 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Michael H. Simon |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
OPINION and ORDER - Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 20 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted as to all of Plaintiffs claims except her claim for discrimination on the basis of sex.IT IS SO ORDERED.DATED this 16th day of August, 2018, by United States District Judge Michael H. Simon. (peg)
|
|
Filing
14
Opinion and Order - Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF 5 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff may proceed with her first, second, and fourth claims, alleging violations of federal law, consistent with Plaintiff&# 039;s clarification that she is not alleging disability discrimination. Plaintiff may proceed with her third claim, alleging retaliation in violation of state law, but only to the extent that it is not based on allegedly unlawful acts that occurred before January 29, 2016. Signed on 8/10/2017 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
