McAdory v. M.N.S & Associates, LLC et al
| Jillian McAdory |
| DNF Associates, LLC and M.N.S & Associates, LLC |
| 3:2017cv00777 |
| May 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Marco A. Hernandez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 71 is GRANTED and Defendant DNF's Motion for Summary Judgment 67 is DENIED. Therefore, the sole remaining issue in this case is Plaintiff's request for damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on June 7, 2021, by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (pvh)
|
|
Filing
43
Opinion and Order on Motion for entry of Rule 54(b) Judgment 40 .Plaintiff's motion for entry of Rule 54(b) judgment as to Defendant DNF 40 , is granted.Plaintiff is directed to submit a proposed form of judgment within ten (10) days of the date of this Opinion. Upon entry of the Rule 54(b) judgment against DNF, the Court will stay the claim against M.N.S. pending resolution of the appeal. Signed on 9/23/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (sss)
|
|
Filing
34
Opinion and Order re Plaintiff's motion to amend 29 , construed as a motion for reconsideration, is denied. Signed on 3/11/2018 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (sss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
