Ritchie v. Staton et al
| Brent Ritchie |
| Multnomah County Sheriff's Office and Daniel Staton |
| 3:2017cv00844 |
| May 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| John V. Acosta |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 29 as my own opinion. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 11 is GRANTED with prejudice as to the First Claim for Relief, and GRANTED without prejudice as to the Second Claim for Relief, to the extent that Plaintiff may refile the Second Claim in state court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 5/16/18 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
