Ashbaugh v. Yamhill County District Attorney's Office et al
| Brian Cody Ashbaugh |
| Yamhill County District Attorney's Office and Yamhill County Jail |
| 3:2017cv01038 |
| June 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Paul Papak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 100 . The Court Grants DAO Defendants' motion for summary judgment 85 and Denies Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment 88 . County Defendants' ; cross-motion for summary judgment 90 is Granted in Part. Defendants Svenson and Yamhill County Jail are Dismissed, and Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim against Yamhill County is Dismissed. Plaintiff's and County Defendants' motions for summary judgment on Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim are Denied. Signed on 12/12/19 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gm)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 57 . The Court Denies the DAO Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 46 and the County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 47 . Signed on 10/3/18 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gm)
|
|
Filing
38
OPINION & ORDER: YCDAO's Motion to Dismiss 24 is deemed voluntarily Withdrawn, with leave to refile. Signed on 11/29/17 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
