Laizure v. Washington County et al
| Seth Eugene Laizure |
| Phong Tran and Washington County |
| 3:2017cv01254 |
| August 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Stacie F. Beckerman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
OPINION AND ORDER. In light of the Ninth Circuit's mandate and for the reasons set forth above, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 92 ), and enters summary judgment for Defendants on all of Laizure's claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 9/7/2021 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (gw)
|
|
Filing
73
OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons set forth above, the Court GRANTS Laizure's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 54 ), as follows: the Court will (1) enter summary judgment for Laizure on his claims for false arrest under Oregon la w and Section 1983 (Claims Two and Four), and (2) enter summary judgment for Laizure on the following elements of his malicious prosecution claims: (a) the commencement and prosecution by the defendant of a judicial proceeding against a plaintiff, (b) the termination of the proceeding in the plaintiff's favor, and (c) the absence of probable cause to prosecute the action (Claims Three and Five). The Court DENIES Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 57 ). The parties shall confer regarding proposed case management deadlines, and file a joint proposal within 14 days. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 11/18/2019 by Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (gw)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER - No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Acc ordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 32 . Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF 24 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Specifically: (1) Plaintiff's federal claims against Washington County (Claims Two and Three) are dismissed with leave to amend; (2) Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claims (Claims Two and Three) are dismissed as duplicative; and (3) Plaintiff's Claim Six is dismissed as duplicative. Plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days of the Court's order. Signed 7/31/2018 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
