McCullen v. Ives
Petitioner: Robert Linn McCullen
Respondent: Richard Ives
Case Number: 3:2017cv01260
Filed: August 14, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: John Jelderks
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Opinion and Order: For reasons stated on the record at oral argument, I decline to adopt Judge Jelderks's F&R. I further GRANT the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 . The judgment in petitioner's criminal proceeding, 6:10-cr-60136-AA, is VACATED. Resentencing shall be scheduled. Signed on 5/10/2018 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCullen v. Ives
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Richard Ives
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Linn McCullen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?