Blocker v. BET et al
||Amazon, BET and Myspace
||September 8, 2017
||US District Court for the District of Oregon
||Portland (3) Office
||John V. Acosta
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 28, 2019
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Acostas recommendation and ADOPT the F&R 83 in full. Defendants BETs and Amazons Motions to Dismiss 61 , 62 are GRANTED, BETs Request for Judicial Notice 70 is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 59 is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed on 3/28/2019 by Judge Michael W. Mosman.(Mailed to Pro Se party on 3/28/2019.) (kms)
|August 8, 2018
OPINION and ORDER - Upon review, I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 51 in full. BET's, Myspace's, and Amazon's Motions to Dismiss 16 , 24 , 33 are GRANTED. Dismissal is without prejudice as to Mys pace to allow Mr. Blocker to bring his claims against Myspace in a court of competent jurisdiction. The claims against BET and Amazon are dismissed with leave to amend. If Mr. Blocker chooses to amend, he must file his amended Complaint within 14 days of the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 8th day of August, 2018, by Chief United States District Judge Michael W. Mosman. (peg) (copy of this opinion and order mailed to plaintiff)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?