Walker v. Fred Meyer Inc

Plaintiff: Daniel Walker
Defendant: Fred Meyer Inc
Case Number: 3:2017cv01791
Filed: November 8, 2017
Court: Oregon District Court
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Youlee Yim You
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 21, 2018 47 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - Judge You's F&R is adopted in part, as supplemented herein. With respect to the issue of Plaintiff's Article III standing to bring his § 1861b(b)(3) claim, the court declines to adopt that portion of the F&R. Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF 24 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 6/21/2018 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Fred Meyer Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fred Meyer Inc
Represented By: J. Michael Porter
Represented By: Taylor D. Richman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Walker
Represented By: Neal Weingart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?