First Interstate Bank v. VHG Aviation, LLC et al
First Interstate Bank |
Christopher Gilchrist, TSE, Inc., VGH Aviation, LLC, VHG Aviation, LLC and James Valvano |
3:2017cv01877 |
November 22, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
Michael H. Simon |
Contract: Other Contract Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 Opinion and Order - Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (ECF 10 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 13 ) is DEFFERED. The Court allows Defendants 60 days from the date of this Op inion and Order to take discovery needed to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court shortens Plaintiff's time to respond to any document requests, requests for admission, and interrogatories propounded by Defendant to 14 days from receipt. Plaintiff also shall promptly make available for deposition any witnesses whom Defendants seek to depose who are employed by or otherwise under the control of Plaintiff. Not later than May 1, 2018, Defendants may file a suppleme ntal response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff may file a supplemental reply not later than May 15, 2018. If Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied, the Court will allow all parties additional time to complete pretrial discovery. Signed on 2/1/2018 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.