Mendivil v. Ives
Petitioner: Ramon Mendivil
Respondent: Richard Ives
Case Number: 3:2018cv00133
Filed: January 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Ann L. Aiken
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Opinion and Order: The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 1 is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED. The Motion for Preliminary Injunction 2 is DENIED as moot. Signed on 06/25/2018 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (jw) (copy of order mailed to petitioner)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendivil v. Ives
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Richard Ives
Represented By: Jared Hager
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ramon Mendivil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?