Snell v. McCauley Potter Fain Associates et al
| Renee M. Snell |
| McCauley Potter Fain Associates and State of Oregon, Department of Human Services |
| 3:2018cv00227 |
| February 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Michael H. Simon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
Opinion and Order - Defendant's Motion to Strike (ECF 88 ) is denied. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 89 ) is granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 33 ) is denied. This case is dismissed. Signed on 7/31/2019 by Judge Michael H. Simon.(Mailed to Pro Se party on 7/31/2019.) (mja)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER - Defendant MPFA's motion for summary judgment (ECF 15 ) is GRANTED. Defendant DHS' motion to dismiss (ECF 19 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's Rehabilitation Act claim against DHS is dismissed withou t prejudice. Plaintiff's breach of contract claim against DHS is dismissed with prejudice. To the extent Plaintiff seeks judicial review of an order or decision of DHS, Defendant DHS' motion to dismiss that claim is denied, but Plaintiff is ordered to submit a more definite statement of her claims not later than 30 days after the date of this Order. Signed on 7/18/2018 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
