Reilly v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| Sean Patrick Reilly |
| Commissioner Social Security Administration |
| 3:2018cv00460 |
| March 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| John V. Acosta |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES: Dated this 2nd day of October, 2020, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (pjg)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $2,370.77 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, depen dent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then th e check shall be made out to Plaintiff's attorney and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office as follows: Merrill Schneider, P.O. Box 14490, Portland, OR 97293. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. DATED this 19th day of May, 2020, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (pjg)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER: This Court has reviewed and adopts Magistrate Judge Acosta's F&R 18 to which no objections were filed and REVERSES the Commissioner's decision and REMANDS this proceeding for the immediate calculation and payment of benefits. See attached Order. Signed on 2/18/20 by Judge Karin J. Immergut. (jy)
|
|
Filing
18
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION - For the reasons stated above, this case should be remanded for an immediate award of benefits pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). SCHEDULING ORDER: The above Findings and Recommendation are referred to a United States District Judge for review. Objections, if any, are due within 14 days. If no objections are filed, review of the Findings and Recommendation will go under advisement that date. Dated this 18th day of November, 2019 by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (pjg) Modified filed date on 11/19/2019 (pjg).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reilly v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Renata Gowie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sean Patrick Reilly | |
| Represented By: | Merrill Schneider |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
