Hayes et al v. City of Portland et al
Steven Hayes and Venus Hayes |
City of Portland and Andrew Hearst |
3:2018cv00988 |
June 5, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
John V. Acosta |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE - For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (ECF No. 76 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: Plaintiffs' Motion is granted as to Defendants' third, fourth, s ixth, seventh, twelfth, thirteenth, and sixteenth affirmative defenses in their entirety, as to Defendants' eighth affirmative defense as it applies to Plaintiffs' federal claims, and as to the allegations in paragraph 63(a)-(l) and para graph 63(q) of Defendants' eleventh affirmative defense, and they shall be stricken; Plaintiffs' Motion is denied as to Defendants' fifth, ninth, and tenth affirmative defenses in their entirety, as to Defendants' eighth affirma tive defense as it applies to Plaintiffs' state law claims, and as to the allegations in paragraph 63(m)-(p) of Defendants' eleventh affirmative defense. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 10th day of March, 2020 by United States Magistrate John V. Acosta. (pjg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.