Committe v. Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP et al
| Bruce Committe |
| Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP and P. K. Runkles-Pearson |
| 3:2018cv01013 |
| June 7, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Ann L. Aiken |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 623 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's application for IFP status 1 is granted as his application shows an inability to pay the required filing fees. Plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed, with prejudice. Accordingly, this action is dismissed. Signed on 2/1/2021 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 2/1/2021.) (ck)
|
|
Filing
11
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 10 is DENIED. Consistent with this Court's previous opinion, Plaintiff is granted 21 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies noted in the previous order and opinion. Signed on 4/10/2020 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 4/10/2020.) (ck)
|
|
Filing
9
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court defers ruling on plaintiff's IFP petition. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED. Plaintiff is granted 21 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies noted herein. Signed on 1/23/2020 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (Mailed to Pro Se party on 1/24/2020.) (ck)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
