J. Lilly, LLC v. Clearspan Fabric Structures International, Inc. et al
J. Lilly, LLC |
Clearspan Fabric Structures International, Inc. and Storm Construction, LLC |
3:2018cv01104 |
June 25, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Portland (3) Office |
John Jelderks |
Contract: Other Contract Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 OPINION & ORDER: The consequential damages waiver in the construction agreement is enforceable and precludes Plaintiff from recovering consequential damages from Defendant Clearspan arising out of Clearspan's alleged breach of the constru ction contract. Plaintiff has failed to produce sufficient evidence in support of its lost profits claim. For those reasons, the Court dismissesPlaintiffs lost profits claim. The Court further finds that ordering Defendants to pay Plaintiff's lo st profits claim would require Defendants to violate the Controlled Substances Act and dismisses Plaintiff's lost profits claim on that additional basis. Defendant Clearspan's motion for partial summary judgment 43 is GRANTED. Signed on 4/13/2020 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (jp) |
Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER - Defendant's motion to transfer 13 is DENIED. See attached 8-page Opinion and Order. Signed on 10/2/2018 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (pg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.