Foote v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Wayne Foote
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2018cv01515
Filed: August 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Portland (3) Office
Presiding Judge: Michael W Mosman
Referring Judge: Jolie A Russo
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Notice of Appearance of Heather L. Griffith appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration Filed by on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Griffith, Heather)
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge Paul Papak to Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo. (eo)
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 8/27/2018, answer due on 12/26/2018. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney. (Attachments: #1 Attachment return receipt US Attorney) (Brewer, Bruce)
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Michael W. Mosman to Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (eo)
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (rs)
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (rs)
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Proposed Summons Filed by Wayne Foote. (Brewer, Bruce)
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: GRANTING Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (rs)
August 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Wayne Foote. (Brewer, Bruce)
August 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Wayne Foote against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Brewer, Bruce)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Foote v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By: Heather L. Griffith
Represented By: Renata Gowie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wayne Foote
Represented By: Bruce W. Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?