Stamos v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Michelle Rose Stamos |
Commissioner Social Security Administration |
3:2018cv01595 |
August 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
John V Acosta |
Michael W Mosman |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 10/18/2018, answer due on 2/15/2019. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney. (rs) |
Filing 10 Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 10/17/2018. Service specifically made upon Regional Counsel or Agency and U.S. Attorney General. (rs) Modified on 10/23/2018 to reflect the the additional document, Return of Service for U.S. Attorney General. NEF regenerated (rs). |
Filing 9 Issued Summons as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Summons, USM 285 form(s), and copies of the Complaint and Order to Proceed in forma pauperis forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service.) (tj) |
Filing 8 Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Michael W. Mosman to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (eo) |
Filing 7 Full Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge.. |
Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (rs) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons Filed by Michelle Rose Stamos. (Schneider, Merrill) |
Filing 4 Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael W. Mosman. Ordered by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (rs) |
Filing 3 ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Signed on 8/30/2018 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (kms) |
Filing 2 Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Michelle Rose Stamos. (Schneider, Merrill) |
Filing 1 Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Michelle Rose Stamos against Commissioner Social Security Administration (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Schneider, Merrill) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stamos v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Renata Gowie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michelle Rose Stamos | |
Represented By: | Merrill Schneider |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.