United States of America v. Carlson et al
| United States of America |
| Charles Harman, Karen L. Carson, Yamhill County, Oregon, Oregon Department of Revenue, Martin J. Strelecky, Teresa A. Strelecky, Julie M. Pettit, Ocwen Financial Corporation and Karen L. Carlson |
| 3:2018cv01598 |
| August 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7403 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Acosta - GRANTING defendant OCWEN Financial Corporation's unopposed motion #11 for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint up to and including 11/1/18. (peg)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Filed by Ocwen Financial Corporation. (Meyer, Charles) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER on Stipulation of Dismissal #9 of Defendant Julie Pettit with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 15th day of October, 2018, by United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg)
|
| Filing 9 Stipulated Motion for dismissal of defendant Julie Pettit based upon disclaimer of interest. Filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stevko, Alexander) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER by Judge Acosta - GRANTING defendants Strelecky's unopposed motion #6 for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to plalintiff's amended complaint up to and including 11/19/18. (peg)
|
| Filing 7 Proposed Proposed Order for a Hearing to Show Cause Granting Defendants Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Filed by Martin J. Strelecky. (Womac, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by Martin J. Strelecky. (Womac, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance of Daniel A. Womac appearing on behalf of Martin J. Strelecky Filed by on behalf of Martin J. Strelecky. (Womac, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Karen L. Carlson, Charles Harman, Ocwen Financial Corporation, Oregon Department of Revenue, Julie M. Pettit, Martin J. Strelecky, Teresa A. Strelecky, Yamhill County, Oregon. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (sss) |
| Filing 3 Amended Complaint . Filed by United States of America against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Proposed Summons, #8 Proposed Summons). (Stevko, Alexander) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 12/28/2018. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 1/28/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 1/28/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (sss)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. (fee exempt status selected (AUSA)) Jury Trial Requested: No. Filed by United States of America against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Proposed Summons, #8 Proposed Summons, #9 Proposed Summons). (Stevko, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
