Ewan v. Walmart Inc.
| Ruth Ewan |
| Walmart Inc. |
| 3:2018cv01784 |
| October 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Michael H Simon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 First Amended Complaint . Filed by Ruth Ewan against Walmart Inc.. (Meyer, Robert) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement . Filed by Walmart Inc.. (Belnavis, Clarence) |
| Filing 8 Declaration of Clarence Belnavis in Support of Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss. Filed by Walmart Inc.. (Related document(s): Motion to Dismiss #7 .) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit) (Belnavis, Clarence) |
| Filing 7 Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss. Filer is subject to the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. Filed by Walmart Inc.. (Belnavis, Clarence) Modified docket text on 11/30/2018 (gw). |
Filing 6
ORDER - The Parties' Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to File Initial Responsive Pleading (ECF #5 ) is GRANTED. Answer or other responsive pleading is due by 11/23/2018. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)
|
| Filing 5 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by All Defendants. (Belnavis, Clarence) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Change of Address. Filed by Ruth Ewan. (Meyer, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Walmart Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (joha) |
|
Filing 2
Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Michael H. Simon and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. Discovery is to be completed by 2/6/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/8/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 3/8/2019. Ordered by Judge Michael H. Simon. (joha)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint. Filing fee in the amount of $400 collected. Agency Tracking ID: 0979-5585535 Jury Trial Requested: Yes. Filed by Ruth Ewan against Walmart Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Meyer, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ewan v. Walmart Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ruth Ewan | |
| Represented By: | Robert K. Meyer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Clarence M. Belnavis |
| Represented By: | Stephen M. Scott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
