Rhapsody Real Estate, LLC v. United States of America, Internal Revenue Service
| Rhapsody Real Estate, LLC |
| United States of America, Internal Revenue Service |
| 3:2018cv01874 |
| October 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| John V Acosta |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2410 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 First Amended Complaint . Filed by Rhapsody Real Estate, LLC against United States of America, Internal Revenue Service. (Phed, Robert) |
Filing 8
ORDER by Judge Acosta - GRANTING the unopposed motion #7 to extend time as follows: (1) Plaintiff is to file its amended complaint no later than 12/21/18. (2) Defendant to file an answer to the amended complaint on or before 1/3/19. (peg)
|
| Filing 7 First Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Expedited Hearing requested. Filed by All Plaintiffs. (Passannante, Mark) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Judge Acosta - GRANTING as amended by the court defendant's unopposed motion #5 for extension of time to respond to plaintiff's complaint. Defendant may have up to and including 12/17/18, in which to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. (peg)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by United States of America, Internal Revenue Service. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stevko, Alexander) |
|
Filing 4
Notice of Case Assignment to Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta and Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order. Discovery is to be completed by 2/22/2019. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report is due by 3/25/2019. Pretrial Order is due by 3/25/2019. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (joha)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER by Judge Acosta - GRANTING defendant's unopposed motion #2 to extend their time to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint, up to and including 12/3/18. (peg)
|
| Filing 2 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Filed by United States of America, Internal Revenue Service. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stevko, Alexander) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal of Case Number 18CV43271 from Multnomah County Circuit Court. (fee exempt status selected (AUSA)). Filed by United States of America, Internal Revenue Service (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Record). (Stevko, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rhapsody Real Estate, LLC v. United States of America, Internal Revenue Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America, Internal Revenue Service | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Stevko |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rhapsody Real Estate, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Robert S. Phed |
| Represented By: | Mark G. Passannante |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
